Interesting idea, but there are several things you could have done differently or better. Sometimes a photographer is trying to capture a perfect shot, their hearts beats quickly and they become really excited, but they forget small, important rules like cutting elbows off! The models upper elbow was cut off by the shot and it makes the shot look amateurish. Next is her other arm that's sinking down into the cloudy water, at first glance it looks like she doesn't have an arm at all, especially since you can't see it through the water. You should of had her put that arm in a different position besides under water. I like your concept of having her vagina covered with "milk", good idea. The only other thing I have to say is her legs look really weird they way she had them placed. It looks stiff and unpleasing. Once again, the way you have the legs cut off make her look like her legs cut off at above the knee. I hope to see better pictures of this model soon. Thank you.
Agree with you on the cropped elbow at the top. That one should have been caught. Not as concerned by the right arm sinking into the water...you can see some extension of it below the surface. I'm not with you on leg placement or where they're cropped. If you're going to crop the legs somewhere--and clearly he had to for this composition--he's chosen a point that doesn't say "amputation crop"...at least not to me. Otherwise, it's a very strong image. I like the concept, and it's dead on tonally.
Sometimes a critic is trying to comment on a perfect shot, their hearts beats quickly and they become really excited, but they forget small, important rules like what a vulva is as opposed to a vagina!
Dose it really matter i'm tired of seeing dudes saying dumb stuff like oh its not a vagina its a vulva..... seriously if girls dont it even call it a vulva then there is no diffrence stop trying to sound smart. it not working